Isaiah saw a vision of two riders.
"And he saw a chariot [with] a couple of horsemen, a chariot of asses, [and] a chariot of camels .."
Who was the rider upon the ass? Every Sunday school
student will tell us that this was a prophecy of Jesus (pbuh),
as stated in John:
"And Jesus, when he had found a young ass, sat thereon; as it is written,"
but who is the promised prophet who would ride the
camel? If it is not Muhammad (pbuh) then this prophecy has yet
to be fulfilled. Let us read on...
"And, behold, here cometh a chariot of men, [with] a couple of horsemen. And he answered and said, Babylon is fallen, is fallen; and all the graven images of her gods he hath broken unto the ground."
Babylon did indeed fall before Islam and the Islamic
nation under the guidance of Muhammad (pbuh) did indeed succeed
in eradicating the worship of idols from Babylon replacing it
with the worship of God alone. In fact, the Muslims were the only
believers in the God of Isaiah to ever succeed in fulfilling this
prophesy (see chapter 10). Continuing ...
"The burden upon Arabia ..."
What does the word "burden" mean? Let us
ask the Scofield Study Bible:
"…which also means an oracle is a word sometimes used in the prophetical writings to indicate a divine message of judgment"
Scofield Study Bible New King James Version, note
1, p. 792
So the Muslims of Arabia (and subsequently Muslims
everywhere) would be assigned the burden of God's message.
"The inhabitants of the land of Tema brought water to him that was thirsty, they prevented with their bread him that fled. For they fled from the swords, from the drawn sword, and from the bent bow, and from the grievousness of war"
Tema, according to John
McKenzie's dictionary of the Bible is
"a place name and tribal name of Arabia;
a son of Ishmael.... The name survives in Teima, an oasis of the
part of the Arabian desert called the Nefud in N Central Arabia."
This word, Tema, is the name of the ninth son of
Ishmael (the father of the Arabs), in Genesis 25:13-15 we read:
"And these are the names of the sons of Ishmael,
by their names, according to their generations: the firstborn
of Ishmael, Nebajoth; and Kedar, and Adbeel, and Mibsam, And Mishma,
and Dumah, and Massa, Hadar, and Tema, Jetur,
Naphish, and Kedemah"
Strong's concordance tells us that this name was
also applied to the land settled by Tema the son of
Ishmael. It goes on to explain how this word is
"probably of foreign derivation". Indeed, this
word, Teima, is an Arabic word which
means "Barren desert". It remains the name of a city
in the Arabian peninsula just north of "Al-Madinah
Al-Munawarah," or "Madinah" for short (Please see
Map 1, page 440). Muhammad (pbuh) and his companions were given
sanction to migrate. They departed Makkah during
the night and left all of their possessions behind. Upon reaching
Madinah they were greeted by it's citizens with open arms and
Muhammad (pbuh) assigned each one of the Muhajireen (citizens
of Makkah) to one of the Ansar (citizens of Madinah)
to house and feed them until they could strike out on their own.
This became the first year of the Arab "Hijra" (Emigration)
calendar used in Islamic countries to this day.
"For thus hath the LORD said unto me, Within a year, according to the years of an hireling, and all the glory of Kedar shall fail. And the residue of the number of archers, the mighty men of the children of Kedar, shall be diminished: for the LORD God of Israel hath spoken [it]."
Kedar* is the second son
of Ishmael, the father of the Arabs:
"And these are the names of the sons of Ishmael, by their names, according to their generations: the firstborn of Ishmael, Nebajoth; and Kedar, and Adbeel, and Mibsam."
Kedar is also synonymous with all of Arabia in general,
as in Ezekiel:
"Arabia, and all the princes of Kedar."
The Arabs of Makkah, the capital of
the paganistic tribes of Arabia of the day, were indeed defeated
by the Muslims in the second year after their forced immigration
from Makkah to Madinah (The Hijra).
This victory signaled the turning point for Islam and a transition
from a position of weakness to one of power and victory (for more,
please read chapter 10).
It should be pointed out here that, as mentioned
at the beginning of this chapter, the children of Israel, from
the tribe of Levi, were distinctly aware of this prophesy.
Indeed this is the very reason why they had begun to immigrate
from the lush and fertile pastures of their holy land of Israel
to the barren parched deserts of Arabia, specifically to Madinah
and the surrounding areas of Khaibar, Tema, and others.
Because they knew that this is where the final prophet would appear.
As mentioned above, these children of the Jews were constantly
threatening the Arab inhabitants of Madinah (the tribes of Al-Aws
and Al-Kazraj) with his impending arrival and how they would follow
him and, through his leadership, they would utterly destroy these
Arabs. They had hoped that this prophet would be from their tribe
and that their presence in this location might facilitate this
When their awaited prophet finally did come, they
rejected him. They wanted a Jewish prophet from their own tribe
and not an Arab from the sons of Ishmael. Thus,
they allowed their pride to come between them and the truth which
they recognized. However, their efforts were not totally in vain.
So continuous were their efforts in threatening the inhabitants
of Madinah with the final prophet's
imminent arrival that when Muhammad (pbuh) finally did come, the
inhabitants of Madinah immediately recognized him and hastened
to follow him before the Jews. These inhabitants of Madinah would
later become among those very first followers of Muhammad (pbuh)
who would one year later go on to fulfill the prophesy of Isaiah
by defeating the "mighty men of Kedar" in
the very first battle of the Islamic nation, the battle of Badr.
As the prophesy requires, one year after prophet
Muhammad (pbuh) and his followers escaped from the torture and
persecution of the people of Kedar and emigrated to
Madinah, the men of Makkah
decided to once and for all put an end to Muhammad (pbuh) and
his followers. They assembled an army consisting of 750 footmen
and 200 horsemen, all of their very best fighters, and all very
well armed. The leaders of this army consisted of the majority
of the leaders of Kedar (see chapter ten). They were confident
of victory and bragged that after this massacre they would be
feared throughout all of Arabia.
The Muslims heard of this amassing of troops and
prepared as best they could. They collected 313 footmen with two
horses and seventy camels. The Muslims fought long and hard with
the men of Kedar and were finally granted victory.
This battle ended in the death of these leaders of Kedar and a
resounding victory for the Muslims.
In this battle, only fourteen Muslims and seventy
pagans from Kedar were killed. Twenty four of those
who died from Kedar were their leaders. In addition, seventy others
from Kedar were taken as prisoners and later ransomed back to
their people (for more see chapter ten).
This was the great turning point for the Islamic
nation. This battle could be said to have been the beginning of
the end for the reign of idolatry and paganism within the land
of Arabia. This Muslim nation would then go on to expand to many
other nations until it spread from Spain to China, fulfilling
many more prophesies in the Bible, including Daniel 2:44, Genesis
15:18-21, and many others.
An unfortunate misconception which has managed to creep into many Western beliefs is that Islam was only spread through force and the sword. Today, however, this notion is beginning to be recognized for the absurdity that it was. A Christian missionary, Sir Thomas W. Arnold says:
"...of any organized attempt to force the acceptance of Islam on the non-Muslim population, or of any systematic persecution intended to stamp out the Christian religion, we hear nothing. Had the caliphs chosen to adopt either course of action, they might have swept away Christianity as easily as Ferdinand and Isabella drove Islam out of Spain, or Louis XIV made Protestantism penal in France, or the Jews were kept out of England for 350 years. The Eastern Churches in Asia were entirely cut off from communion with the rest of Christendom throughout which no one would have been found to lift a finger on their behalf, as heretical communions. So that the very survival of these Churches to the present day is a strong proof of the generally tolerant attitude of Mohammedan [sic] governments towards them"
The Preaching of Islam, A History of the Propagation
of the Muslim Faith, Sir Thomas W. Arnold, Westminster
A. Constable & Co., London, 1896, p. 80.
"Against unbelievers he (Muhammad) enjoined his followers to undertake a holy warefare, but only when attacked. The earlier Moslem[sic] leaders did not try to impose their faith upon other nations"
The History of Christianity in the Light of Modern
Knowledge, A Collective Work, Harcourt Brace and co., p. 520
Muslims did indeed wage many wars, just as many Jews
and Christians did both before and after this. Muslims waged their
wars in self-defense or in order to abolish idolatry, tyranny,
slavery, and oppression. Muslims were commanded to not attack
those who did not attack them, to not cut down a fruit tree, to
not kill the animals, to not take the people's property, to not
harm women or children or old people so long as they did not fight
with them, and to not burn crops.
When they were victorious, the Muslims were commanded
not to destroy the churches nor the synagogues, nor to force the
people to convert to Islam. The people were allowed to continue
to practice their religion without persecution or being forced
to convert (Compare for example with Numbers 31, and Deuteronomy
20. Please also compare with the great Spanish inquisitions).
"There is no compulsion in religion. The right path is henceforth distinct from misguidance"
The noble Qur'an, Al-Bakarah(2):256.
If Islam was indeed spread by the sword and not by
it's spiritual appeal, then how do we explain, for example, the
fact that Islam is the religion of the majority of the people
of the country of Indonesia even though no Muslim army ever set
foot on their land and they can by no stretch of the imagination
be labeled as Arabs? The only contact these people ever had with
Islam was through Muslim traders who passed through their lands.
If the truth were to be known, in almost every single
battle the Muslims ever participated in, they were almost always
vastly outnumbered. For example, when the Muslims finally overthrew
the pagan Byzantine superpower in the battle of Al-Yarmook of
the year 636 C.E., the Muslim army consisted of 40,000 fighters
verses 200,000 solders in the Byzantine army. So although many
historians may like to attribute the fall of this superpower to
any number of factors such as claiming that they were taxed and
weary from previous battles with the Romans, (while not claiming
that the Muslims were taxed and weary from their previous battles),
and although they refuse to believe that this victory could have
come from the Almighty, still, one needs to wonder if this victory
were not through divine intervention then how do we explain the
fact that an ill-equipped army of Bedouin sheep herders who were
outnumbered more than four to one could so resoundingly defeat
one of the two "superpowers" of their age?
"The extinction of race consciousness as between Muslims is one of the outstanding achievements of Islam and in the contemporary world. There is, as it happens, a crying need for the propagation of this Islamic virtue."
The Genuine Islam, Vol. 1, George Bernard Shaw, No.
"I have always held the religion of Muhammad in high estimation because of its wonderful vitality. It is the only religion which appears to me to possess that assimilating capacity to the changing phase of existence which can make itself appeal to every age. I have studied him-the wonderful man and in my opinion far from being an anti-Christ, he must be called the Savior of Humanity. I believe that if a man like him were to assume the dictatorship of the modern world, he would succeed in solving its problems in a way that would bring it the much needed peace and happiness: I have prophesied about the faith of Muhammad that it would be acceptable to the Europe of tomorrow as it is beginning to be acceptable to the Europe of today."
Hamilton Gibb, Whither Islam, London, 1932, p. 379.