From Qlaya, Southern Lebanon Published: 26 July 2006 http://news.independent.co.uk/world/fisk/article1197767.ece QLAYA, Southern Lebanon: The battle for Southern Lebanon is on an epic scale but from the heights above Khiam, the Israelis appear to be in deep trouble. Their F-16s turn in the high bright sun - small silver fish whose whispers gain in volume as they dive - and their bombs burst over the old prison where the Hezbollah are still holding out; but beyond the frontier, I can see livid fires burning across the Israeli hillside and the Jewish settlement of Metullah billowing smoke. It was not meant to be like this, 13 days into Israel’s assault on Lebanon. The Katyushas still streak in pairs out of Khiam, white contrails that thump into Israel’s hillsides and border towns. So is it frustration or revenge that also keeps Israel’s bombs falling on the innocent? In the early hours of yesterday morning, a tremendous explosion woke me up, rattling the windows and shaking the trees outside and a single flash suffused the western sky over Nabatea. The lives of an entire family of seven had just been extinguished. And how come – since this now obsesses the humanitarian organisations working in Lebanon – that the Israelis bombed two ambulances in Qana, killing two of the wounded inside and wounding the third civilian for the second time in a day. All the crews were injured – one with a piece of shrapnel in his neck – but what worried the Lebanese Red Cross was that the Israeli missiles had clearly pierced the very centre of the red cross painted on the roof of each vehicle. Did the pilots use the cross as their aiming point? The bombardment of Khiam has set off its own brushfires on the hillside below Qlaya, whose Maronite Christian inhabitants now stand on the high road above like spectators at a 19th century battle. Khiam is – or was – a pretty village of cut stone doorways and tracery windows but Israel’s target is the notorious prison in which – before its retreat from Lebanon in 2000 – hundreds of Hezbollah members and in some cases their families were held and tortured with electricity by Israel’s proxy South Lebanon Army militia. This was the same prison complex – turned into a ‘Museum of Torture’ by the Hezbollah after the Israeli retreat that was visited by the late Edward Said shortly before his death. More important, however, is that many of the Hezbollah men originally held prisoner here were captives in cells built deep underground below the old French mandate fort. These same men are now fighting the Israelis, almost certainly sheltering from their firepower in the same underground cells in which they once languished, perhaps even storing some of their missiles there. In Marjayoun next to Qlaya – once the SLA’s headquarters – Lebanese troops are desperately trying to prevent Hezbollah guerrillas using the streets of the Greek Catholic town to fire yet more missiles at Israel. Seven-man army patrols are moving through the darkened alleyways of both towns at night in case Hezbollah brings yet more Israel bombs down on our heads. In war, all one’s senses are quickened. Dawn, birds, music, flowers acquire a new meaning. A family is still living in the little villa opposite my house and I watched a woman at dusk, picking vegetables in her garden for supper, ignoring the howl of Israeli aircraft in the sky above her and the sinister changes in air pressure from their bombs. In Beirut, one observes the folly of western nations with amusement as well as horror but sitting in these hill villages and listening to how US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice plans to reshape Lebanon is clearly a lesson in human self-delusion. According to American correspondents accompanying Ms Rice on her visit to the Middle East, she is proposing the intervention of a Nato-led force along the Lebanese-Israeli border for between 60 and 90 days to assure that a ceasefire exists, the deployment after this of an enlarged Nato-led force throughout Lebanon to ensure the disarmament of Hezbollah, and then the retraining of the Lebanese Army before it too deploys to the border. This plan – which like all American proposals on Lebanon is exactly the same as Israel’s demands - carries the same depth of delusional conceit as that of the Israeli consul-general in New York who said last week that ‘most Lebanese appreciate what we are doing’. Does Rice think the Hezbollah want to be disarmed, albeit it under the terms of UN Security Council resolution 1559? By Nato? Wasn’t there a Nato force in Beirut which fled Lebanon after a group close to the Hezbollah bombed the US marine base at Beirut airport in 1983, killing 241 US servicemen, and dozens more French troops a few seconds later? Does anyone believe that Shia Muslim forces will not do the same again to any Nato "intervention" force. The Hezbollah have been waiting and training and dreaming of this war for years, however ruthless we may regard their actions. They are not going to surrender the territory they liberated from the Israeli Army in an 18-year guerrilla war, least of all to Nato at Israel’s bidding. The problem, surely, is that the United States sees this bloodbath as an "opportunity" rather than a tragedy, a chance to humble Hizballah’s supporters in Tehran and help to shape the "new Middle East" of which Rice spoke so blandly yesterday. In fact it will more likely to prove to be Syria’s attempt to humble Israel and the United States in Lebanon. Of course, the Hezbollah have brought catastrophe to their co-religionists. All the way down the Bekaa Valley to Southern Lebanon, the long, dangerous, bomb-cratered roads I had to travel to reach Qlaya were deserted save for cars driven by panicking men, crammed with families, trailing white sheets out of the windows in the forlorn hope – after all the Israeli air attacks on civilians – that this would provide them with protection. The only civilian walking these frightening roads was a goatherd, shepherding his animals around the huge craters. Talking to him, it emerged that he was almost stone deaf and could not hear the bombs. In this, it seemed, he had a lot in common with Condoleezza Rice. – The Independent |
|